To the Editor:
 
I am enjoying the series on voting systems.  It is a difficult subject with no easy answers, and sure to upset many.  Bravo!
As you discuss proportional voting systems though, you may want to insert another term to your glossary:
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem
The theorem states that when there are more than two alternatives (candidates), no ranked voting system can be free of paradox.
I am sure that the advocates you have contacted have probably neglected to mention this small matter, but it is quite important.  
For example, using a ranked voting system it would be possible for a candidate to get the most first place votes and still lose if one of his opponents received more second place votes.  That is not to say that this would happen every time or even often, but it would be possible every time. 
Imagine the panic at the Election Commission when it does!  If you think candidates, campaigns, parties and voters get riled up now about close elections, what would be their reaction to their candidate having the most first place votes and then losing to the second or third runner-up in the second round?
Just food for thought.
 
Jim Randall
Summerville
 
" />

No voting method perfect

  • Tuesday, August 6, 2013

 
To the Editor:
 
I am enjoying the series on voting systems.  It is a difficult subject with no easy answers, and sure to upset many.  Bravo!
As you discuss proportional voting systems though, you may want to insert another term to your glossary:
Arrow's Impossibility Theorem
The theorem states that when there are more than two alternatives (candidates), no ranked voting system can be free of paradox.
I am sure that the advocates you have contacted have probably neglected to mention this small matter, but it is quite important.  
For example, using a ranked voting system it would be possible for a candidate to get the most first place votes and still lose if one of his opponents received more second place votes.  That is not to say that this would happen every time or even often, but it would be possible every time. 
Imagine the panic at the Election Commission when it does!  If you think candidates, campaigns, parties and voters get riled up now about close elections, what would be their reaction to their candidate having the most first place votes and then losing to the second or third runner-up in the second round?
Just food for thought.
 
Jim Randall
Summerville
 

Comments

Notice about comments:

Summerville Journal Scene is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. We do not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Summerville Journal Scene.

If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full terms and conditions.

Upcoming Events
Poll
 Latest News
Print Ads
Latest Videos


Summerville Journal Scene

© 2014 Summerville Journal Scene an Evening Post Industries company. All Rights Reserved.

Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Parental Consent Form.