Scott signs on to end earmarks

  • Thursday, February 7, 2013

Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) continues his commitment to protect taxpayer dollars from wasteful government spending by signing on as an original cosponsor of the Earmark Elimination Act (S. 126). The legislation would permanently ban Congressional earmarking.
“For too long, Congress directed money from the pockets of hardworking Americans to pet projects,” Scott said. “Families across South Carolina and the nation do not think backroom deals in Washington are the best use of their tax dollars, and neither do I.”
Scott continued, “We cannot credibly talk about getting our fiscal house in order without permanently banning earmarks. ‘Cleaning up Washington’ should not just be a political catch phrase, but instead a call to action. I stand committed to stopping the wasteful spending that threatens our nation’s future, and this legislation is a great step in the right direction.”
For years, earmarking led to huge amounts of federal taxpayers’ money being directed to lawmakers’ home states with little or no opportunity for review. The non-partisan watchdog Citizens Against Government Waste estimates Congress spent $208 billion on earmarks from 2000-2009. The infamous “Bridge to Nowhere” is a well-known example of this.
The Earmark Elimination Act, introduced by Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA), seeks to cut wasteful spending of taxpayer dollars by expanding the current moratorium to permanently ban earmarking. Specifically, the bill would:
Define earmarks as any congressionally directed spending item, limited tax benefit, or limited tariff benefit.
Create a point of order against any legislation containing an earmark. The point of order would only apply to the actual earmark, rather than to the entire bill.
Require a two-thirds vote to waive the point of order.


Notice about comments:

The Journal Scene is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. We do not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Journal Scene.

If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full terms and conditions.

Upcoming Events
 Latest News
Print Ads

The Journal Scene

© 2015 The Journal Scene an Evening Post Industries company. All Rights Reserved.

Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Parental Consent Form.