Subscribe to Out & About GamesPhotoblogsVideoAPSpecial PublicationsE-EditionPrep ZoneLowcountry Marketplace
 Printer friendly version |   E-mail to a friend

 


Smith Says: Miserable or unenlightened... I don't think so
Published Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:58 PM
By Julie R. Smith
Summerville Journal Scene ®

According to an article on Newsweek.com, “polyamory” is the latest wrinkle in the love world. I can’t even pronounce it, but some people live it. And like it.

Ployamory is when a couple takes other partners, with everyone’s full, informed consent. (Not to be confused with polygamy, generally defined as a lifestyle wherein men take multiple wives, ostensibly at the command of God.)

Here’s an example of polyamory: Dan loves Anne. Anne has a crush on Stan and informs Dan, who gives his blessing for their relationship. In the meantime, Dan falls for an old friend, Pam, who’s living with Sam. Sam gives Pam and Dan the go-ahead, because he’d like to smooch on Anne—if it’s okay with Stan, and it probably will be.

They might live communally, or in separate, fluid combinations. Just reading about the hookups among the group (pod? herd? gaggle?) of polyamorists profiled in the article gave me a headache.

I want whatever vitamins these folks have, because taking care of one man wears me out. (He is, let us note, my lawfully wedded spouse. Or, as my redneck friend Reba Mae says, “We got papers.”)

The Newsweek article said there are more than a half-million openly polyamorous families in the U.S. Polyamory is supported in blogs and social networks, and an e-zine called “Loving More” claims 15,000 regular readers.

Now, I’m no prude. (We all know I am.) I’ve seen the movie “Kinsey” (hated it) and believe that whatever adults do in the privacy of their homes is not my business (as long as children or animals aren’t involved. Then it becomes my business and yours, I hope.)

I don’t care if you’re gay, straight, marry nine times or swing like a chimpanzee. I’m just not interested. But why on earth would you choose to be in simultaneous relationships? Where’s the payoff? When would you nap, and with whom? Whose clothes would you fold? Who would you watch American Idol with? When would you find time to run errands, cut your toenails or eat leftover lo mein standing over the sink?

My husband is the best friend I’ve ever had, but we take time apart: He enjoys fellowship with his friends on Friday night, and I don’t ask him to hang with me at the gym. Thus we juggle those fragile balls called love and autonomy.

With polyamory, forget it. You’re not juggling, you’re dancing as fast as you can. Sounds exhausting to me.

If you want to keep your options open, here’s a simpler, albeit more boring concept: Date. Remember dating? It’s where you go to a movie with Dan on Wednesday, grab coffee with Stan on Friday and play poker with Fred on Saturday. On Sunday you write about them on your blog (okay, you can skip that part).

Proponents of polyamory describe themselves as open-minded, free-spirited and unwilling to burden one person with all their emotional and physical needs. One woman quoted said it’s “sad” when people don’t “realize they have a choice.” Well, boo-hoo.

If you want to live with and/or love with everyone in your zip code, go for it. Doesn’t matter to me.

But to suggest that we who choose monogamy are miserable or unenlightened is both mean-spirited and unfair.

Besides, I never could dance.

Julie R. Smith, who learned to juggle with frozen fish sticks, can be reached at widdleswife@aol.com.


Comments
Notice about comments:

Journalscene.com ® is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Journalscene.com ® does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Journalscene.com ®. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by reading our terms and conditions, and then signing up below!



Full terms and conditions can be read here.

 
Cal me silly
Friday, August 14, 2009 1:54 AM

Call me silly, but when I promised to love, for better for worse, till death parts us, I actually meant it. To me, (in my narrow, prudish mind) words have always MEANT something! Of course there will always be temptation out there, but so what? It serves as nothing more than a confirmation of what I already know MEANS something. You can never erase the history of a marriage. In a true marriage, there is this one person out there who cares more about you than anyone else in the whole entire world. Nothing is better than that. I dearly love the man I married, and, although we have both changed over the 22 years we have been together, we both still remember the things that we first loved about each other. The thought of "sharing" mself with someone else who doesn't really know me makes me want to vomit. I'm just not made that way and I'm thankful for it. I know who I am!

Posted by: diamond girl

Thursday, August 13, 2009 6:49 AM

It doesn't sound like anything "new" -- ideas about "open" marriage have been tossed around for a long time. - I won't make too many judgments about what works for others -- I know what works for me -- but I will comment that I see a policy of "honesty" as psychologically healthier than the denial and deception that can sometimes be seen with couples who claim monogamy is the only way. - Just because two people decide to marry, doesn't mean that there won't be sexual -- or genuine "love" -- attraction (sometimes powerfully felt) for others besides the chosen spouse. Marriage doesn't include an "off" switch for our natural sexual and companionship desires. - Making choices about how to deal with the attractions to other members of the opposite sex that married people may (likely) feel at some point in their marriage -- to act or not to act on those desires -- is something each couple needs to determine for themselves. - I don't think that anyone choosing "polyamory" is suggesting that those who choose monogamy are "miserable or unenlightened" (though I haven't read the Newsweek article, or kept up on the latest ideas coming from those proposing "open" marriages). - I will say that I think it is sad to see couples "claiming" a devotion to monogamy "sneaking around" and cheating on a spouse. (A perfect example is with what was just revealed with Governor Sanford.) - Honesty in relationships is always better than deception.

Posted by:

Betty
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:37 PM

I love this! I have been married for 25 years and the idea of "swinging" gives me hives. I finally got him broken in. Why would I want some other woman to benefit from all of my hard work? Frankly, we are as comfortable together as a really great pair of shoes. Who wants new shoes blisters?

Posted by:




Poll Question

For entertainment, I mainly go out in...
  • Dorchester County
  • Berkeley County
  • Charleston
  • Mount Pleasant
  • Beach
  • Outside the Lowcountry
  • I barely go out
 

 



  About Us | Trident Health Check |  Berkeley Independent |  The Gazette |  Worship Directory | Destination Downtown | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
104 East Doty Avenue | Summerville, SC 29483 | 843-873-9424 office | 843-873-9432 fax